Friday 16 October 2026 · updated 12:11 am
Northern Beaches (median beach) · today
HIGH
54/100
activity index (daytime average)
Highest 7pm–9pm (58).
Water temperature favours white sharks.
On conditions alone, today scores higher than 99% of past October days at Manly (1991-2025).
The index is a relative rating, not a probability. Shark bites are rare on any day, but sharks can be present on every day, including Typical days. Swim at your own risk. How it works.
Through the day
Shaded = before sunrise (06:12) and after sunset (19:08). The headline averages 5am–9pm.
What to watch for
-
Tagged white shark detected (1.86 m) at Killcare Beach
Recent shark activity2 days ago
-
Tagged white shark detected (1.84 m) at Killcare Beach
Recent shark activity2 days ago
-
Tagged white shark detected (2.04 m) at North Steyne Beach
Recent shark activity3 days ago
-
Tagged bull shark detected (2.3 m) at Palm Beach
Recent shark activity3 days ago
-
Shark sighted at North Curl Curl Beach
Recent shark activity3 days ago
-
Heavy rain: 47 mm recently
Heavy rain in the past 8 daysExpect murky water near the harbour, lagoon mouths and Broken Bay for up to a week. Avoid brown, murky water.
-
Fish reported close to shore: jewfish / mulloway, drummer, luderick, whiting
Baitfish and fish runsDee Why beach, North Palm Beach, Narrabeen beach (latest report 2026-09-30). If you see bait schools, diving birds or anglers working, stay out of the water, especially late afternoon and dusk.
By beach 2 Elevated12 High ›
Beaches differ through nearby shark activity and how exposed they are to harbour, lagoon or river plumes after rain. Tap one to see its rating.
Why today scores this way
Points each factor adds today out of its maximum, averaged over the day, from most to least within each group. Factors adding nothing today are greyed out. Each shows how strong the evidence behind it is; local knowledge is kept on purpose with small weights. Tap a factor to see why it scored what it did, how its points work, and the evidence.
Confidence describes how strong the evidence is, not how much a factor matters. Low confidence often just means too few studies: sharks are rare, hard to observe and impossible to experiment on, bite records mostly track how many people are swimming, and few studies have tested these factors near Sydney. A low-confidence factor can still matter; it simply has not been shown to yet.
Live shark activity
+9.1 of 35 Recent shark activity nearby All sharks · 2 sharks / sightings within 12 km (4 days) High confidence ›
High confidence
Today: +9.1 of 35. Strongest: white shark tagged detection at North Steyne Beach, 2.9 days ago, 2.3 km away, worth 16% on its own. 2 animals or sightings combined give 26% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +35 A white, bull, tiger or unidentified shark detected or sighted within 2 km in the last 6 hours (and within 3 km / 24 h the beach is forced to High)
- +20.7 The same shark a day ago
- +17.5 Detected or sighted ~7 km away in the last 6 hours
- +14 A harmless species close by, or a fresh drumline capture ~6 km away
- +10.5 Within 2 km but two days ago
- 0 Nothing within 12 km in 4 days (weak evidence: only tagged sharks near a receiver are heard)
Tagged-shark detections, drone/lifeguard sightings and drumline or net captures from SharkSmart in the last 4 days. Full weight within 2 km, fading to zero at 12 km; weight halves every 24 h; repeat pings of one tagged shark count once. A detection or sighting within 3 km in the last 24 h forces HIGH at that beach.
Evidence: Location and recent detections explain about ten times more of white shark presence than all weather variables combined (17.3% vs 1.8% deviance). White sharks cluster: up to five off the same beach on the same day. An alert is strong evidence a shark is present; silence is weak evidence it is absent, because only tagged animals are heard and only within ~500 m of a receiver.
High confidence
Species and season
+14.0 of 14 White shark water temperature (15-21°C) White sharks · 20.0°C Medium confidence ›
Medium confidence
Today: +14 of 14. 20.0°C is inside the 16–20.5°C peak band; October is in the May–November season. Result: full points.
How the points work
- +14 16–20.5°C water, May to November
- +9.8 16–20.5°C water, December to April
- +7 Around 15.3°C or 21.5°C (edges of the band), in season
- 0 Below 14.5°C or above 22.5°C
Peaks when nearshore water is 16-20.5°C, strongest May-November.
Evidence: NSW drumline catches of white sharks are highest at 15-21°C and decline above 21°C; mesh-net abundance peaks near 17-18°C. This is a good seasonal flag but adds little day to day within the season.
Medium confidence
+4.4 of 22 Bull shark water temperature (>20°C) Bull sharks · 20.0°C High confidence ›
High confidence
Today: +4.4 of 22. 20.0°C is on the edge of the 22–25.5°C peak band (20% on temperature); October is in the October–May season. Result: 20% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +22 22–25.5°C water, October to May
- +11 Around 20.75°C, in season
- +8.8 22–25.5°C water, June to September
- 0 Below 19.5°C
Rises above 20°C and peaks at 22-25°C, October to May. Sydney Harbour mouth makes Manly and Palm Beach end especially relevant.
Evidence: The best-replicated presence relationship on the NSW coast: occurrence on NSW beaches rises above 20°C and peaks at 23°C (233 tagged sharks); in Sydney Harbour only water temperature mattered (52.5% of variability explained). Bull sharks leave once water falls to ~19-20.5°C, and arrivals are now recorded in October.
High confidence
- Smoothey et al. 2023 (233 tagged bull sharks, NSW ocean beaches)
- Smoothey et al. 2019 (7 years of Sydney Harbour bull shark telemetry)
- Smoothey et al. 2016 (Sydney Harbour bull shark catches)
- Lee et al. 2019, MEPS (bull sharks on the EAC shelf)
- Lubitz et al. 2025 (15 years of Sydney bull shark telemetry)
+1.0 of 10 Late afternoon to night Bull, Tiger & white sharks · 18:00 Medium confidence ›
Medium confidence
At 6pm, its strongest hour: +3 of 10. 6pm is in the 6pm–1am peak window; the water suits white sharks most, which count for at most 30% here. Result: 30% of the maximum.
This changes hour by hour: +3 at 6pm, and something in 7 of the 16 daytime hours, so the daily average is +1.
How the points work
- +10 6pm–1am, in bull or tiger shark water
- +6 4–6pm or before sunrise, in bull or tiger shark water
- +3 6pm–1am in white shark water only
- 0 Daytime, or water that suits none of the three species
Bull and tiger sharks come nearshore from late afternoon through the night (strongest ~6pm-1am), with a little extra on dark nights. Full in bull or tiger shark water; white sharks count for 30%.
Evidence: Large tagged bulls on NSW beaches were nearshore from midday to 4am, peaking ~18:00-01:00; the authors recommend "afternoon and low-light" messaging rather than "dawn and dusk". Réunion bulls and tigers were caught more at and after dusk and on dark nights. Juvenile white sharks tagged off NSW showed essentially no daily pattern, so in white shark water this counts for only 30%, as local knowledge.
Medium confidence
0 of −8 Cold upwelling below ~15°C White sharks · 20.0°C Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: 0 of −8. 20.0°C is at or above 15°C, so nothing is taken off.
How the points work
- 0 15°C or warmer: no effect
- −4 About 14.25°C
- −8 13.5°C or colder: full reduction
Reduces the white shark score when an upwelling drops water below ~15°C.
Evidence: Tagged juvenile white sharks started searching for warmer water within 10-12 h of upwelling below 14°C and most left within days; Cape Town sightings were 5-8x more likely at 18°C than 14°C. North-easterlies drive this kind of upwelling off Sydney.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
0 of 6 Tiger shark water temperature (>22°C) Tiger sharks · 20.0°C Medium confidence ›
Medium confidence
Today: 0 of 6. 20.0°C is outside the 21.5–30°C range; October is outside the December–May season, so ×0.5. Result: no points.
How the points work
- +6 23–27°C water, December to May
- +3 23–27°C outside December–May, or about 22.3°C in season
- 0 Below 21.5°C
Summer-autumn visitor in ~22-26°C water. A small share of NSW nearshore records.
Evidence: Tiger sharks were 43 of 494 SMART drumline captures and absent from 36,384 drone flights; their east-coast movements follow water-temperature change.
Medium confidence
Ocean conditions
+3.8 of 4 Warmer than usual for the time of year White sharks · +0.9°C vs normal Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: +3.8 of 4. Water is 0.9°C above normal for the date (full at +1°C). Result: 95% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +4 1°C or more above normal
- +2 0.5°C above normal (the level tested)
- 0 Normal or cooler, or water outside the white shark range (above ~22.5°C)
Today's satellite water temperature off the beaches compared with the long-term normal for this date, counted only while the water is in the white shark range. A Hunter shark fisherman's warning: unusually warm water pushes white sharks onto the beaches.
Evidence: In this project’s tests, white shark bites were about 1.8× as likely in weeks 0.5°C+ warmer than the same week in other years (85 bites, 95% range 1.07–3.04), the clearest result among the ocean ideas. But a warm spring also brings more people into the water, which that comparison cannot remove. SharkSmart white shark detections in 2026 showed no day-to-day difference, and fell as the warm water arrived in October. The Macquarie thesis found the opposite (bites at slightly cooler anomalies, on a coarse grid).
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
+3.0 of 16 Heavy rain in the past 8 days Bull & tiger sharks · 59 mm (7 days), wettest 3 days 47 mm Medium confidence ›
Medium confidence
Today: +3 of 16. 47 mm of relevant rain is worth 62% on rain alone; water is poor for bull sharks, so it is held at the 30% floor. Result: 19% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +16 100 mm+ of rain in bull shark water (22°C+, October–May)
- +9.6 45 mm in bull shark water
- +4.8 100 mm+ in cold water (held at a 30% floor for tiger sharks and plume effects)
- 0 Under 20 mm
Starts at 20 mm and is strong from 45 mm (local, or harbour/Hawkesbury catchment) over the past 1-8 days. Mostly a bull shark factor, so it is scaled by water temperature.
Evidence: Bull sharks were more frequent on NSW beaches after >45 mm of rain; in Sydney Harbour heavy rain moved bulls within a day and their prey within 2-7 days. Not significant for white sharks on NSW drumlines. Tiger bite risk rose with rainfall in national data.
Medium confidence
+1.5 of 10 Estuary or lagoon plume after rain Bull & white sharks · Curl Curl Lagoon; 47 mm relevant rain Medium confidence ›
Medium confidence
Today: +1.5 of 10. 47 mm of rain (72% of a full plume) × Curl Curl's 40% exposure to Curl Curl Lagoon × 52% for water temperature (40% floor, full in bull shark water). Result: 15% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +9 60 mm+ of catchment rain at Palm Beach (90% exposure to Broken Bay), in bull shark water
- +7 The same at Manly (harbour) or Narrabeen (lagoon), 70% exposure
- +2.8 The same at Manly in cold water (40% temperature floor)
- 0 Under 15 mm of rain
Beaches near the harbour, a lagoon or Broken Bay score higher when that catchment has had heavy rain, because murky, prey-rich water flushes out along the beach.
Evidence: Distance to a river mouth was a significant predictor of white shark sightings and of white and whaler bites; harbour flushing after heavy rain moves bulls and teleost prey. For one fixed beach the distance is constant, so only the rain-driven plume changes day to day.
Medium confidence
+0.9 of 5 Cooler-than-surroundings water (SST anomaly) White sharks · vs coast -0.19°C, vs 30 days +1.4°C Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: +0.9 of 5. Inshore is 0.19°C cooler than the coast either side (19%). Result: 19% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +5 Inshore water 1°C+ cooler than the coast either side, or 2°C+ below its 30-day mean, in white shark water
- +2.5 0.55°C cooler than the coast, or 1.25°C below the 30-day mean
- +0.5 Just 0.1°C cooler than the coast either side
- 0 Less than 0.1°C cooler than the coast and less than 0.5°C below the 30-day mean, or water outside the white shark band
Satellite SST anomaly inshore versus the coast 20-100 km either side, or versus the last 30 days. Applies within the white shark temperature band.
Evidence: The Macquarie thesis behind the "cool pockets" claim is real but its signal was ~0.3°C on a 100 km monthly grid, validated at 66.67% on a balanced test set, and it never linked cool pockets to river mouths or prey. Réunion bite rates were far higher in cooling months. This project tested it at daily 5 km resolution (see Backtest): pockets cooler than the coast either side made no difference to NSW bites, and SharkSmart white shark detections in 2026 leaned slightly higher on 0.1°C+ cooler days but were lower on strongly cooler (0.5°C+) days. Days cooler than the last 30 had fewer bites, probably because cold snaps keep people out of the water. Kept small.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
0 of 6 Murky water (satellite turbidity) Bull sharks · Kd490 0.099 (baseline 0.133) Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: 0 of 6. Water is 0.74× its recent baseline turbidity, not murky enough to count (starts at 1.2×).
How the points work
- +6 Water twice as murky as its recent baseline, in bull shark water
- +3 1.6× the baseline
- +1.8 Twice as murky in cold water (30% floor)
- 0 Up to 1.2× the baseline, or no satellite data
Satellite Kd490 (light attenuation) nearshore versus its recent baseline. Murkier water favours bull sharks.
Evidence: Bull sharks were more frequent at higher Kd490 in Réunion and water visibility affected KwaZulu-Natal net catches; not significant for white shark drumline catch in NSW. Satellite ocean colour within 1-2 km of shore is noisy, so confidence is low.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
0 of 3 Chlorophyll bloom (satellite) All sharks · 0.43 mg/m³ (0.7x baseline) Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: 0 of 3. Chlorophyll is 0.7× its recent baseline (starts at 1.3×, full at 2.5×). Result: no points.
How the points work
- +3 Chlorophyll 2.5× its recent baseline or more
- +1.5 About 1.9× the baseline
- 0 Up to 1.3× the baseline, or no satellite data
Chlorophyll-a well above its recent baseline: a productive-water signal, the kind of input the SharkChess satellite model uses.
Evidence: Productive water feeds plankton and baitfish, which draw every kind of predator, so this applies to all sharks. White sharks searched intensively near productive fronts at shelf scale. The one bull shark study points the other way (bulls on the shelf favoured low chlorophyll), and satellite chlorophyll is unreliable within a few km of the coast. The "90% accurate" South Australian satellite AI (ESpy Ocean) is unpublished and measures movement direction, not beach risk.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
0 of 2 Moderate swell 1.8-2.8 m (bull sharks) Bull sharks · 1.1 m Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: 0 of 2. 1.1 m swell is outside the 1.5–3.3 m range.
How the points work
- +2 1.8–2.8 m swell, in bull shark water
- +1 About 1.65 m or 3.05 m, in bull shark water
- 0 Under 1.5 m or over 3.3 m, or water too cold for bulls
A small bull shark bonus in 1.8-2.8 m swell.
Evidence: Bull sharks were more frequent on NSW beaches at 1.8-2.8 m swell; swell was not significant for white or bull sharks on drumlines.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
Fishing and wildlife intel
+3.1 of 12 Baitfish and fish runs (fishing reports) All sharks · 2 recent reports Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: +3.1 of 12. Strongest: jewfish / mulloway at Dee Why beach (16 days old, strong report, nearshore), worth 15% on its own. 2 reports combined give 26% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +10.9 Two strong, fresh (under a week) nearshore reports at this beach
- +8.4 One strong, fresh nearshore report at this beach
- +5 One strong report at another Northern Beaches beach, or a medium one here
- +3.8 One strong report somewhere in the area (place not pinned down)
- 0 No relevant report in the last 3 weeks
Recent fishing reports of salmon, tailor, mullet, pilchards, jewfish (mulloway) or bait schools close to shore, weighted by recency (3 weeks), place and strength.
Evidence: SharkSmart advises watching for baitfish, diving birds and dolphins, and prey density is one of the biggest drivers of fish behaviour. But no study has quantified prey runs against shark presence on Sydney beaches, and angler reports measure where people fish as much as where fish are.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
+1.5 of 5 Whales, dolphins and diving birds All sharks · whale migration season Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: +1.5 of 5. Southbound humpback migration with calves (September–November) gives 30%; no whale, dolphin or diving-bird reports in the last 3 weeks. Result: 30% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +5 Several strong, fresh nearshore reports at this beach (e.g. whales plus birds working)
- +3 A strong, fresh whale sighting close to shore at this beach
- +2.5 Diving birds or a bait ball at this beach
- +2 A dolphin pod at this beach
- +1.5 Southbound humpback migration with calves (September–November), nothing reported
- +1.3 Peak northbound humpback migration (June–July), nothing reported
- 0 Outside migration season (January–April), nothing reported
Humpback migration season, plus reported whales, diving birds or bait balls, and dolphin pods near shore, weighted by recency (3 weeks), place and strength. Whale carcasses are a separate, much heavier factor.
Evidence: Official SharkSmart advice lists diving birds and dolphins as warning signs, and white sharks are known to shadow the humpback migration, but no quantitative link to beach presence has been established near Sydney. The ranking (whales, then birds working bait, then dolphins) is local judgement.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
0 of 25 Whale carcass nearby White & tiger sharks · none reported Medium confidence ›
Medium confidence
Today: 0 of 25. No whale carcass reported in the last 2 weeks.
How the points work
- +25 Carcass at this beach, reported in the last 5 days
- +20 At the next beach along (~2 km)
- +15 Floating offshore of this beach
- +12.5 ~8 km along the coast, or reported in the area with no exact place
- +5 15 km+ away (the far end of the Northern Beaches)
- 0 None reported in the last 2 weeks (a carcass fades out between days 5 and 14)
A dead or stranded whale reported on or off the Northern Beaches in the last 2 weeks. Full for 5 days, then fading; full at the beach it is on, less with distance along the coast.
Evidence: Whale carcasses reliably draw white and tiger sharks: up to 40 white sharks fed on one carcass in a single day in False Bay, and NSW beaches near carcasses have been closed after many sharks gathered (Royal National Park). Unlike most intel, this is direct evidence of a food source that holds sharks for days, but the pull on beaches several km away has not been measured.
Medium confidence
Local knowledge and lore
+5.0 of 5 Any rain in the last 48 h (>2 mm) All sharks · 12.8 mm Low confidence ›
Low confidence
Today: +5 of 5. 12.8 mm in the last 48 hours (starts above 2 mm, full at 10 mm). Result: full points.
How the points work
- +5 10 mm or more in the last 48 hours
- +2.5 6 mm
- 0 2 mm or less
Local belief that even light rain stirs up runoff and fish near shore.
Evidence: Rain effects in the shark-presence literature come from plume-scale events (45-100 mm+), roughly 20-50x this 2 mm threshold. But in this project's backtest of past NSW bites, days after 2 mm+ of rain were bite days more often than matched days at the same place, and the lean was the same for white and bull/whaler bites. Rain usually keeps people out of the water, so beach crowds are unlikely to explain it. Bite records are a weak yardstick, so this is low confidence, not proof.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
+1.8 of 2 Warm water offshore, cooler band inshore White sharks · offshore +1.4°C vs inshore Local lore ›
Local lore
Today: +1.8 of 2. Offshore water is 1.4°C warmer than inshore (starts at 0.5°C, full at 1.5°C). Result: 92% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +2 Offshore water 1.5°C+ warmer than inshore
- +1 1°C warmer (the level tested)
- 0 Less than 0.5°C difference, warmer inshore, or inshore water outside the white shark range
Satellite water temperature 35-65 km offshore vs right off the beaches, counted only while the inshore water is in the white shark range. The fisherman's idea: warm East Australian Current water offshore squeezes white sharks into the cooler strip along the coast.
Evidence: White sharks have been tracked searching along temperature fronts at shelf scale. In this project’s tests the bite data pointed the other way (bites about half as likely on these days, for white and bull sharks alike), most likely because cooler water at the beach keeps people out of it. SharkSmart white shark detections in 2026 leaned the fisherman’s way (about 1.3× on these days) but not clearly. Kept as local knowledge with a small weight.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Local knowledge, unvalidated
+1.6 of 5 Dawn and dusk All sharks · 13 min from sunrise/sunset Low confidence ›
Low confidence
At 6am, its strongest hour: +5 of 5. 6am is 13 min from sunrise: within the hour, so full points.
This changes hour by hour: +5 at 6am, and something in 6 of the 16 daytime hours, so the daily average is +1.6.
How the points work
- +5 Within 60 minutes of sunrise or sunset
- +2.5 60–90 minutes away
- 0 More than 90 minutes away
Within about an hour of sunrise or sunset.
Evidence: Standard precautionary advice, and dawn/dusk is a real feeding window for many fish. But NSW telemetry shows juvenile whites have essentially no daily pattern and bulls peak from late afternoon into the night. Only 12% of WA white shark attacks fell within an hour of sunrise/sunset, about what chance predicts. Kept as precautionary local knowledge with a modest weight.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Low confidence
+1.0 of 1 Small swell (<1.5 m) All sharks · 1.1 m Evidence disagrees ›
Evidence disagrees
Today: +1 of 1. 1.1 m swell is under 1.5 m, so full points.
How the points work
- +1 Swell under 1.5 m
- 0 1.5 m or bigger
Belief that sharks come closer in when the swell is small.
Evidence: Bull sharks were more frequent in 1.8-2.8 m swell; drones and drumlines only operate in calmer conditions, so small-swell "effects" are partly when the gear can see. Small swell does put more people in the water.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Contradicted by evidence
+0.8 of 2 Strong southward current (East Australian Current) White sharks · 0.46 m/s southward about 50 km offshore Local lore ›
Local lore
Today: +0.8 of 2. Strongest southward current 0.46 m/s about 50 km offshore (42% on current); water 0.9°C above normal lifts it to 98% of that. Result: 41% of the maximum.
How the points work
- +2 0.75 m/s+ southward and water 1°C+ above normal
- +1.2 0.75 m/s+ southward, normal water temperature
- +0.6 0.5 m/s southward (the level tested), normal temperature
- 0 0.25 m/s or less, or water outside the white shark range
The strongest southward surface current up to ~95 km off the beaches today (modelled), with more when the water is also warmer than usual, counted only while the water is in the white shark range. The fisherman's warning: currents far stronger than usual, arriving all at once, crowd white sharks onto the beaches.
Evidence: Satellite current data covers too few past bites to test this (about 30), and 2026 SharkSmart white shark detections showed no difference on strong-current days, or on strong-and-warm days. The daily figure comes from a current model; the tests used satellite altimetry, which arrives too late for a daily rating. Kept as local knowledge with a small weight.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Local knowledge, unvalidated
+0.5 of 1.5 Rapid air pressure change All sharks · +3.3 hPa / 6 h Local lore ›
Local lore
At 10am, its strongest hour: +1.5 of 1.5. Pressure rose 3.3 hPa over the 6 hours to 10am (starts at 1.5, full at 3). Result: full points.
This changes hour by hour: +1.5 at 10am, and something in 9 of the 16 daytime hours, so the daily average is +0.5.
How the points work
- +1.5 A rise or fall of 3 hPa or more over 6 hours
- +0.8 2.25 hPa
- 0 1.5 hPa or less
A change of 3 hPa or more over 6 hours, an angling belief about fish feeding.
Evidence: Fails on physics (3 hPa equals a fish moving ~3 cm vertically) and the one robust shark result runs the other way: blacktips moved deeper as pressure fell. The pro-pressure claims trace to angling blogs.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Local knowledge, unvalidated
+0.5 of 1.5 Heavy cloud cover (>90%) All sharks · 96% Local lore ›
Local lore
At 7am, its strongest hour: +1.5 of 1.5. 96% cloud at 7am (starts above 75%, full at 95%). Result: full points.
This changes hour by hour: +1.5 at 7am, and something in 9 of the 16 daytime hours, so the daily average is +0.5.
How the points work
- +1.5 95% cloud or more
- +0.8 85% cloud
- 0 75% or less
The "grey day feels sharky" heuristic.
Evidence: No study isolating cloud as a shark predictor was found. The feeling is probably driven by murky water after rain, which the heavy rain and turbidity factors capture more directly.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Local knowledge, unvalidated
+0.3 of 1.5 Around high tide All sharks · 0.8 h from high tide Local lore ›
Local lore
At 11am, its strongest hour: +1.5 of 1.5. 11am is 0.8 h from high tide: within the hour, so full points.
This changes hour by hour: +1.5 at 11am, and something in 4 of the 16 daytime hours, so the daily average is +0.3.
How the points work
- +1.5 Within an hour of high tide
- +0.6 1–2 hours from high tide
- 0 More than 2 hours away
Within about an hour of high tide.
Evidence: No tide effect on large NSW bull sharks, trivial for juvenile whites, and California white sharks were fewer at higher tide. On a sandy beach, high tide mostly moves the waterline. Flood vs ebb at an estuary mouth may matter, untested.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Local knowledge, unvalidated
0 of 1.5 Full moon All sharks · 26% lit (Waxing crescent) Evidence disagrees ›
Evidence disagrees
Today: 0 of 1.5. The moon is 26% lit (starts above 75%, full at 95%). Result: no points.
How the points work
- +1.5 Moon 95% lit or more
- +0.8 85% lit
- 0 75% lit or less
Moon more than ~85% illuminated.
Evidence: NSW net catches of all three species fall as moonlight rises, and sightings were 4x higher at new moon in Cape Town. A global analysis of 2,156 bites found about as many lunar effects as chance predicts. The evidence-based version is the small dark-night bonus inside the bull shark night factor.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Contradicted by evidence
0 of 4 Onshore wind (NE to SE) All sharks · 161° at 11 km/h Local lore ›
Local lore
Today: 0 of 4. The last 24 h averaged 161° at 11 km/h: not onshore (45–135°), so no points.
How the points work
- +4 NE to SE (45–135°) at over 20 km/h
- +2.4 NE to SE, 20 km/h or lighter
- 0 Any other direction
Prevailing wind over the last 24 h (speed-weighted average direction) from 45-135°, stronger above 20 km/h.
Evidence: No shark-presence study supports it. At Sydney a north-easterly blows alongshore and drives upwelling of colder water (pushing water offshore), rather than pushing bait onto the beach, and wind reduces acoustic receiver range, so telemetry "wind effects" are partly artefacts. In this project's backtest of past NSW bites, onshore-wind days were bite days more often than matched days, driven by white shark bites (bull/whaler bites leaned the other way). Warm north-east sea-breeze days also bring more people to the beach, which the backtest cannot rule out.
Low confidence here reflects limited or conflicting studies, not proof the factor is irrelevant.
Local knowledge, unvalidated
Conditions
- Water temperature
- 20.0°C
- model 20.1°C, satellite 19.8°C (NASA MUR, 2026-10-13)
- SST anomaly
- +0.9°C
- vs coast either side -0.19°C; 35–65 km offshore +1.4°C
- Current
- 0.46 m/s
- strongest southward flow, ~50 km offshore (model)
- Rain
- 13 mm / 48 h
- 59 mm / 7 days; harbour catchment 40 mm
- Turbidity (Kd490)
- 0.099
- baseline 0.133; satellite 2026-10-11
- Wind (24 h)
- 161° · 11 km/h
- speed-weighted average direction
- Swell (noon)
- 1.1 m
- waves 1.2 m
- Moon
- 26% lit
- Waxing crescent
- Sun
- 06:12 – 19:08
- sunrise – sunset
For the bigger picture, see the latest SST and anomaly maps on IMOS OceanCurrent.
Data notes for today (2)
- Fishing intel skipped (OPENROUTER_API_KEY / PERPLEXITY_API_KEY not configured).
- Fishing research unavailable today; using intel from 2026-10-15.
SharkSmart activity nearby
Last 4 days, Northern Beaches and harbour mouth. Silence is weak evidence: receivers only hear tagged sharks within ~500 m.
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Killcare Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Killcare Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.84 m) at Killcare Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Palm Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Palm Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Palm Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Palm Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 1.86 m) at Palm Beach, 2 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (white shark, 2.04 m) at North Steyne Beach, 3 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (bull shark, 2.3 m) at Palm Beach, 3 days ago
- Tagged shark detected (bull shark, 2.3 m) at Killcare Beach, 3 days ago
- Shark sighted at North Curl Curl Beach, 3 days ago
Check the official SharkSmart app for live alerts before you go.
Fishing and wildlife reports
Reports are sparse: the newest solid local fishing report is from 30 September, with no October tackle-shop update yet. Jewfish were caught off Dee Why, North Palm Beach and Narrabeen beaches, whiting/bream were active along Narrabeen/Collaroy, and drummer/luderick were on Mona Vale, Curl Curl and Long Reef rocks; salmon and kingfish were also working Pittwater and nearby reefs. An unconfirmed 1.5 m shark was reported at Manly Beach on 2 October, and a Manly aggregator lists salmon in season at beach gutters, but there are no confirmed recent baitfish schools or wildlife sightings.
- Australian salmon, Manly – beach gutters, rock platforms and bay edges (2026-10-14). Aggregator conditions report rates conditions 'fair' and lists Australian salmon in season; not a confirmed catch report Fishing Report Hub – Manly
- shark, Manly Beach (2026-10-02). Reported ~1.5 m shark prompting water evacuation; unverified because primary article could not be re-fetched Northern Beaches Advocate – Public Safety Round Up, 3 October 2026
- jewfish / mulloway, Dee Why beach (2026-09-30). Several jewfish/mulloway in the 10+ kg class, around the full moon Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- jewfish / mulloway, North Palm Beach (2026-09-30). Several jewfish/mulloway in the 10+ kg class, around the full moon Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- jewfish / mulloway, Narrabeen beach (2026-09-30). Several jewfish/mulloway in the 10+ kg class, around the full moon Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- jewfish, Narrabeen Lake, near the caravan park (2026-09-30). 90 cm jewfish caught during the week Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- salmon, Pittwater – West Head and Barrenjoey (2026-09-30). Large schools of salmon hanging around in close; caught on small 5–10 g metal lures; shore vs boat not specified Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- kingfish, Pittwater – West Head and Barrenjoey (2026-09-30). Decent kingfish under the salmon; let bait or soft plastic sink below the salmon Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- kingfish, Newport Reef / Maitland Reef (2026-09-30). Kingfish around the 85 cm class, offshore on fresh squid or large tuna/mullet strip baits Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
- kingfish, Long Reef in close – the Wall and White Rock (2026-09-30). Good numbers of kingfish, offshore/reef Narrabeen Bait and Tackle Fishing Report – 30 September 2026
Compiled 2026-10-15 from public reports by an AI research step. Low confidence: angler reports show where people fish as much as where fish are.
Customise factor weights Optional. Turn factors up or down to match your own experience. Saved in a cookie on this device only. ›
Changing weights changes the rating you see, not the underlying evidence.